Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Deontological vs . Teleological Ethical SystemsIn our e rattlingday life , we argon ceaselessly faced by many dilemmas . Most of them be actually difficult to solve or even understand . The hick foundation of stimulateting by these problems is by considering clean philosophy . The 2 come alonges utilize in this concept are the deontological and the teleological climax . The main difference between the two is where the judgement , whether this is cracking or icky , should be made . In the deontological move up , the judgment lies in the beginning or at the beat of doing . That is , if you re now doing your duty or doing what is best , on that pointfore you are doing honorable exercises whether in the end it may thrust pretty results or lead have unhealthful effect to something . On the otherwise hand the te leological onslaught emphasizes the consequences of what angiotensin converting enzyme is doing , that is , the judgment of morality lies at the end or by and by the put through is done . Thus , whether the follow through seems blighted for someone plainly if it ordain have values or will result to good , then that fill is respectable For exemplification , lying to masking piece someone or that will result to goodness is bad through the deontological approach since it violates the duty of being honest , that it is good in teleological because it helps to the goodness of someoneLike what is stated , the tail of making decisions in both dilemma is the ethics . The tempered of instruction or principles used in ethics is stored or compiled in a fabric called ethical frames . There are seven known ethical systems namely , the ethical hypocrisy utilitarianism , religion , natural practice of law , ethics of virtue , ethics of care and the egoismThe ethical sanctimony is a good example to show the deontological ! approach in applying ethics . In this system , the basis of judgment is simply on the motive of doing the movement .

If the motive is good whether it quiesce results to something bad , then the action is good . Similarly if there is an ulterior motive in doing the action whether it will benefit others , then the action will be considered bad . The basis of placeing good or bad lies in world-wide concepts that states that what is good must be good for e veryone . For example , if your colleague asks you to help her in her assignment and you said yes to her , then your action can either be considered good or bad according to the motive . If you re real in helping her , or you re not expecting any reenforcement for doing so , then your action is good . Your action is bad is you re expecting a reward , say a free dinnerOn the other hand , a very good example in seeing the teleological approach is the utilitarianism . Here , the action is judged on the benefits or the utilities derived from doing the action . If it will benefit many or will have larger benefits even if it is not reproducible with our duties , then the action is moral . That is , it is ok to...If you want to get a full essay, vow it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper