Anti Nature Concept by Nietzsche Essay

The name of Nietzsche occupies one of the leading places among the greatest philosophers till nowadays. His modulates can be traced in postmodernism and existentialism. His theories and views ar studied by scientists and students his profound and sharp lowstanding of reality and human nature attract attention of numerous great deal every last(predicate) over the world. His closely closely-known theory is related to Will of Power. The notion of the superhuman Uebermensh as a key to understanding of the power, every human being is gallery inside, totally confronts the general philosophic approach , where all reasons and questions are investigated only the in the frames of sole truth. These ides are developed in his work The Twilight of the Idols, where the readers father Nietzsches strong confrontation of the Socratess approach of rationalism. His strongest critic of the Socratess views relates to lack of life appreciation and resistance of the human instincts, because he st ates, that Resisting instincts is just a sickness and not at all a way back to virtue or happiness. (Bailey 2002). Here we are coming closer to the major smirch of our research, namely to the understanding of morality. One of the most vital concepts of Nietzsche was his suggestion, that morality builds the serious obstacle for enjoying of most of life passions and desires, or how he formulated it morality as anti-nature.In his work Morality as Anti-Nature Nietzsche is discussing the ways, how religion and morality, spread via religion, are able to change and suppress human nature. Nowadays a lot of people are living harmonise to some biblical rules and precepts. During the times, when Nietzsche lived, the church was considered to be even a stronger mentor for most individuals, who made their choices and selected their life directions only base on the rules, preached by the priests. Nietzsche was absolutely against it he insisted that religion did not consider the nature of human ity. According to the church all people were to fight against their bad sides, where according to Nietzsche all people were born initially good and they did not need the religious rules to follow them, but rather follow their own desires andpassions. The highest potential in development throughout the whole life can be reached, as Nietzsche stated, only with the help of inside passions, and never the ideals of church. The church demanded from its followers to suppress all the passions in order to become real Christians. In this way the church was exchanging the natural passions of individuals with morality.The idea of free will was also understood by Nietzsche not in the way as it was presented by the church. The believers were supposed to follow all the Gods rules as he was the most powerful being, at the very(prenominal) time, they were to carry responsibility for their decisions and actions. Today we no longer have any pity for the concept of free will we know only too well what it really is the foulest of all theologians artifices, aimed at reservation mankind responsible in their sense, that is, dependent upon them. Here I simply supply the psychology of all making responsible. (Bailey 2002). At this point Nietzsche used this theory for explaining his understanding of cause and effect. The churchs use of counterfactual causality expands to an imaginary and false perception in the mind, and people ultimately jump to conclusions, giving all the credit to a higher form or being. (Bailey 2002). Nietzsche also criticized the situation when instead of looking for plausible answers. The followers of the church just believed, that the word of God was the only true reason. Thus Christianity, as he wrote, was to bear the responsibility for making its followers unsympathetic minded and going against their nature. He ultimately believed that religion creates a concept of anti-natural morality which damages our development as humans quite greatly, eventually termi nus our status and right as individuals once the church gets involved (Jacobus 13).In Nietzsches eyes, it was an attempt to substitute all the intelligence and natural passions, human beings were possessing, with cover and poor spirituality. In this case, he stated, that those, who could invent all such spiritual and moral restrictions, were ill-willed and not able to restrain their own passions. They themselves were not inclined to farther intellectual and moral development, thus they used morality as anti-nature to restrict other individuals in improvement of their lives. Only individuals, who are absolutely not under control of any morality, could be referred to as ideal human beings, because their actions and choices would be found purely upon their natural passions. Their judgments concerning right and wrong things would be under the influence oftheir inside passion only. Overall, we have studied the key notions of the Nietzsches theory, related to the issues of morality, wh ich according to him is the most serious obstacle in formation of life direction, based on the natural instincts and passions. On the one hand, he could be right saying that morality itself is certainly restraining the activities and decisions of people. However, on the other hand our ability to control our emotions and passions is the major feature, which defines us as human beings, not animals.Works citedBailey, A. First Philosophy Fundamental Problems and Readings in Philosophy. Broadview Press. 2002Jacobus L.A. A World of Ideas Essential Readings for College Writers. Bedford/St. Martins. 2013Hayman, R. Nietzsche A precise Life. Oxford University Press (New York), 1980.